Cases 111 - 120 of 442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kalawa et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv01969
Defendant:
U.S. General Service Administration, ABC CORP. 1-10, John/Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Amara Kalawa and Alfreda Bangura
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Doe v. Center for Vein Restoration (MD), LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01943
Defendant:
Center for Vein Restoration (MD), LLC and Sanjiv Lakhanpal, MD
Petitioner:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Owens-El v. Ms. Barbara et al
as 1:2020cv01845
Defendant:
Jane Doe Deputy Head of Security, Jane Doe Head of Security, Ms. Barbara and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Owens-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rock Spring Plaza II, LLC v. Investors Warranty of America, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01502
Plaintiff:
Rock Spring Plaza II, LLC
Defendant:
Investors Warranty of America, LLC, Rock Springs Drive, LLC and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v Loyola University
as 1:2020cv01227
Defendant:
Loyola University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis v. Harmond et al
as 1:2020cv01070
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dhanaraj et al v. Markel Insurance Company
as 8:2020cv00970
Plaintiff:
Christina Dhanaraj Daycare and Christina Dhanaraj
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00420
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Human Rights Defense Center v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Warden Suzy Malagaria
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
