Cases 111 - 120 of 293
Mizell v. Travis County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv00883
Defendant:
John Joe #1, Sally Hernandez, Travis County Medical Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Mizell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy et al v. Snell et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Defendant:
Richard Perez, Katie Snell, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Kennedy and Richard Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2018cv00807
Defendant:
John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Roberson v. McCann's et al
as 6:2018cv00465
Defendant:
FNU Warren, Kenny McCann's, Fnu Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. McCann's et al
as 1:2018cv00749
Defendant:
Kenny McCann's, Captain FNU Smith, ., Captain FNU Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Infante v. Ector County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Saints Infante
Defendant:
Ector County Sheriff's Office, John Doe, 2, J. Grissam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkle v. Patrick et al
as 6:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Sargent, Hughes Unit Corey L. Altum, Correctional Officer John Doe, 1, Correctional Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Burkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Schmaderer et al
as 3:2018cv01141
Plaintiff:
Melvin McCormick
Defendant:
Todd Schmaderer, John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shippitsa Limited v. Slack et al
as 3:2018cv01036
Plaintiff:
Shippitsa Limited
Defendant:
Andrew Jon Slack, MoreNiche Limited, Wolfson Berg Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Ware v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
Kim Jones, Wanda Jones, Joe White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
