Cases 111 - 120 of 1,256
KING v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KING v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA S. KING
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHANNON v. TOMORROW ENERGY CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SHANNON
Defendant:
TOMORROW ENERGY CORP., KING ASHTON MARKETING SERVICES, LLC, KENDRA KING and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KING v. TESLA et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
KIM TESLA, MITCHELL SHAHEN, RICHARD MANCINI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Defendant:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01810
Plaintiff:
RAY KING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
