Cases 111 - 120 of 6,790
Martinez v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00250
Respondent:
Warden Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Patrick L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merryman v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Aaron Thompkins, FNU Brown and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Garza v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 20-20533
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Troy Selman, Warden and Betty Williams, Medical Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Garza
Cravy v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2020cv01051
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Lori Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Matthew Cravy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Davis v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-40630
Petitioner / Appellant:
Terrence L. Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Class v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv03440
Defendant:
Lisa M. Nichols, TDCJ Director Lori Davis, Kimberly Klock and others
Plaintiff:
Luis E. Class
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGruder v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv03731
Defendant:
TDCJ Director Lorie Davis, Sheriff Department and Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne McGruder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Ware et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
TDCJ Hughes Unit Officials, FNU Ware, Robert Armour and others
Plaintiff:
Tujuan Estaisyo Session
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Davis
as 5:2020cv01148
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Ingram, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aldoe Foster v. Thomas Taylor, et al
as 20-40628
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Taylor, Chaplain, Lorie Davis, TDCJ Director, Dan Rose, Retional Chaplain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aldoe Lee Foster
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
