Cases 111 - 120 of 3,409
Lundell v. Associated Bank, N.A.
as 0:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Michael Lundell
Defendant:
Associated Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Weatherspoon v. Covidien LP et al
as 0:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Michael Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Madsen v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
James Michael Madsen
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reid et al v. RealPage Utility Management, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Eleshea Reid and Michael Matthews
Defendant:
RealPage Utility Management, Inc., Bader Management, Inc., YES Energy Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dorney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Michael Dorney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Smith v. Allstate Insurance et al
as 0:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance, AARP, Christine Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilson and Bobbie Jo Wilson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
North American Science Associates, LLC v. Conforti et al
as 0:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
North American Science Associates, LLC and NAMSA
Defendant:
Michael Conforti, Pamela Conforti and Phoenix Preclinical Labs, LLC
Ramos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
