Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 122
Siedlik v. Cohen
as 1:2008cv03554
Plaintiff: Krzysztok Siedlik
Defendant: Gary Michael Cohen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Gary Kremen v. Stephen Cohen
as 08-15824
Plaintiff - Appellee: GARY KREMEN
Defendant - Appellant: STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN
Riches v. Cohen et al
as 6:2008cv01267
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant: Kremen V Cohen, Gary Kremen, Stephen Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephen Cohen v. USDC-CASJ
as 08-71187
: In re: STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN
Petitioner: STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest: JAMES WARE
Uthoff et al v. Golden Child Cab Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv01886
Plaintiff: Michael Uthoff and Cynthia Uthoff
Defendant: Golden Child Cab Corp., Nana Ghosh, Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00790
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Branham et al v. Pocklington et al
as 8:2008cv00005
Plaintiff: Roger Branham, Roger Branham, Roger Branham and others
Defendant: Peter H Pocklington, Naoya Kinoshita, Daniel C Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kremen v. Cohen
as 3:2007mc00449
Petitioner: Gary Kremen
Defendant: Stephen Michael Cohen
Tate v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2007cv05885
Plaintiff: Louise Rogers Tate
Defendant: Nana Ghosh, Michael Cohen, Mohd D. Farugue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Estate of Yaron Ungar et al v. Orascom Telecom Holding, S.A.E.
as 1:2007cv02572
Plaintiff: The Estate of Yaron Ungar, The Estate of Yaron Ungar, David Strachman and others
Defendant: Orascom Telecom Holding, S.A.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?