Cases 111 - 120 of 120
USA v. $21,504.05 et al
as 3:2009cv01366
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
$21,504.05, $16,230 and $4,796
Claimant:
Marrakesh Indus LLC, Brazusa Ent LLC, Monica Teixeira and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shakur v. Furey et al
as 3:2008cv01187
Plaintiff:
Mecca Allah Shakur
Defendant:
Richard G. Furey, Mark Buchanan, Syed Naqvi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Urena Flores et al v. DiBenedetto et al
as 3:2008cv00884
Plaintiff:
Olger Nestor Urena Flores, Olger Nestor Urena Flores, Olger Nestor Urena Flores and others
Defendant:
Antonio DiBenedetto, Anna DiBenedetto, Giovanni DiBenedetto and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhett v. Stein et al
as 3:2008cv00829
Plaintiff:
Eric Rhett
Defendant:
Stein, United States District Court, Jefferson Ins Grp and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhett v. Stein et al
as 3:2008mc00145
Plaintiff:
Eric Rhett
Defendant:
Stein, United States District Court, Jefferson Ins Grp and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perlmutter v. Reed Elsevier Inc
as 3:2008mc00037
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perlmutter
Defendant:
Reed Elsevier Inc
Movant:
Monica Albano
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Eisenstein v. Hartford Fin Svc Group Inc
as 3:2007cv01208
Plaintiff:
Monica Eisenstein
Defendant:
Hartford Fin Svc Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bethea v. Pesanti et al
as 3:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Henry Bethea
Defendant:
Edward Pesanti, Mark Buchanan, Ricardo Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
