Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 111 - 120 of 573
HICKS v. FARDMAN
as 2:2018cv03268
Plaintiff: RANDALL HICKS
Defendant: ANN FARDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. Howard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01406
Respondent: Catricia Howard
Petitioner: Randall Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant: MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAPSY et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv02679
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA TAPSY and RANDAL TAPSY
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION , BAYER U.S. LLC , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARRAN v. HEAPER et al
as 2:2018cv00737
Petitioner: RANDALL HOCKETT PARRAN
Respondent: ORLANDO HARPER and COMMON OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHELTON v. RFR CAPITAL LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02259
Plaintiff: JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant: RFR CAPITAL LLC , ROBERTS A. SIGNORE , RYAN M. COLA and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JAMES v. CHIUCCARELLO et al
as 2:2018cv01845
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS JAMES
Defendant: FILOMENA CHIUCCARELLO, AMALIA CHIUCCARELLO and SHANEICE L. RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS v. RUSCH et al
as 2:2018cv00556
Plaintiff: I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS
Defendant: RANDALL RUSCH and LESLIE RUSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
RANDALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01541
Plaintiff: JAMES RANDALL
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT , JOHN MOUZON and LEON MCKNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?