Cases 111 - 120 of 121
Ellis v. Caudill et al
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Sanchez M Ellis
Defendant:
Darrell Caudill and Fort Wayne Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENTON et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv00648
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN CLAUDE, RACHEL FENTON, PAYJE GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanchez v. Highland Indiana Town of et al
as 2:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Sergio Sanchez
Defendant:
Highland Indiana Town of, Highland Town of Police Dept and TJX Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCDORMAN et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2008mc00050
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCDORMAN and JOSEPH PIEKIELKO
Defendant:
KEVIN SMITH, MICHAEL SANCHEZ, DANIEL MCDONALD and others
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SANCHEZ v. ASTRUE
as 3:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
BRANDY S. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gina R Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DeLange et al v. Vision Drywall LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00228
Plaintiff:
Allan DeLange, Allan DeLange, William Blumm and others
Defendant:
Vision Drywall LLC and Robert Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SANCHEZ et al v. MEIJER STORES LIMI TED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2007cv00750
Plaintiff:
JUANA SANCHEZ and ELMER SANCHEZ
Defendant:
MEIJER STORES LIMI TED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
