Cases 111 - 120 of 34,645
Allison v. Arvisa
as 3:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Christopher Allison
Respondent:
M. Arvisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04749
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FOLK v. BARLET
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
OMAR S. FOLK
Respondent:
WARDEN MCKEAN S BARLET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PROPER v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
STUART J. PROPER
Respondent:
SUPT. THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORAVEC v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ORAVEC
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
