Cases 111 - 120 of 30,354
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Braswell et al
as 5:2024ct03083
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Braswell, Officer Paul, Sgt. Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03084
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Tim Jones, Warden Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breeden v. Eason et al
as 5:2024ct03087
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Eason, Correctional Officer Wargo, Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2024ct03088
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Josh Stein and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blakney v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03082
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sandoval v. USA
as 3:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Jaime Sandoval
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
