Cases 111 - 120 of 24,853
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmons v. Hartson
as 4:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt Mike Hartson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Timmons v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Pvt Tyshawn T Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Cutner v. Dasant et al
as 6:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cutner
Defendant:
Lieutenant Nike Dasant and Esther Labrador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent:
Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. Calhoun County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00698
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Stroman
Respondent:
Calhoun County Sheriffs Department and St. Matthews Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Fernandes v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Fernandes, Sr.
Defendant:
Cherokee County Detention Center, Major Stephen Anderson and Sherille Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
