Cases 111 - 120 of 10,582
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allman v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allman, II
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tibbs, Correctional Officer Sams and Corr. Officer II Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Curtis Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Ward
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Quinton Peterson
Respondent:
Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernazal v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Miguel Bernazal
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fleitas v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Carlos Fleitas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
