Cases 111 - 120 of 1,581
Becker Hurd v. Long et al
as 8:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Susann Becker Hurd
Defendant:
Audrey Long, Mark Schmidt, Cythia Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker v. Regean
as 8:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker
Defendant:
James Regean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peak v. Taylor
as 8:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Peak
Defendant:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kellum et al v. Davis et al
as 8:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Donald Kellum, II, Rosalind Kellum and Sarah Sublet-McClinton
Defendant:
Jeff Davis, Sarpy County Sheriffs Dept., LaVista Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Lee Benson
Defendant:
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker v. Randall County Court
as 8:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker
Defendant:
Randall County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Multiple Lancaster County Sheriff's Deputies
as 4:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Steven Butler
Defendant:
Lancaster County Sheriff's Office and Multiple Lancaster County Sheriff's Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Hunter
as 8:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Teresa Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arentsen v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv03131
Plaintiff:
Nathan James Arentsen
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
