Cases 111 - 120 of 26,339
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OUZTS v. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Caylor Ouzts
Defendant:
JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ASHLEY v. SHEPPARD
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SINCALIR ASHLEY
Defendant:
STAN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOX v. BULKLEY et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
JOHN E FOX
Defendant:
LEVI J BULKLEY and ALLIED PRODUCTION GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVIS
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, B & B TRANSPORT INC, JOE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
