Cases 121 - 130 of 969
Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Duran Tyson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harnage v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jackson Harnage
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vokurka v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
JANICE VOKURKA
Defendant:
WARDEN TOM SCHWEITZER, CAPTAIN CHAMBERLAIN, CAPTAIN ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. HyperSport Industries, LLC
as 2:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Mark Jackson
Defendant:
HyperSport Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Teresa J. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDuffie v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
William McDuffie
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
