Cases 121 - 130 of 372
Jackson v. Fox et al
as 5:2018cv00876
Petitioner:
Kellis Jackson
Respondent:
John Fox and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Midship Pipeline Company, LLC v. 2.331, 2.435, 0.458 acres, Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2018cv00302
Defendant:
1.545, 1.447, 0.154, Bryan County, Oklahoma, Anna Kathryn Chappa, Tom Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Midship Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Jackson et al v. Pesis et al
as 5:2018cv00794
Plaintiff:
Justin Nivin, Stephanie Nivin and Chantz Jackson
Defendant:
Joe Brown Company, Greenwich Insurance Company and Michael Allen Pesis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Bryant et al
as 5:2018cv00616
Petitioner:
Rodney Deron Jackson
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
as 4:2018cv00324
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Jackson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Wesley Prince
Defendant:
City of Tulsa , Stephen Tidwell, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Jackson Well Services, LLC
as 5:2018cv00498
Defendant:
Jackson Well Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dylan Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Automax Dodge Chrysler Jeep et al
as 5:2018cv00488
Plaintiff:
Harry Jackson Davis
Defendant:
Automax Dodge Chrysler Jeep and Municipal Employees Credit Union of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maynard v. Musseman et al
as 6:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Charles Maynard
Defendant:
William Musseman, Cpl. Fusk, Jerry Royal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
