Cases 121 - 130 of 1,176
Murphy v. TFC Partners, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06683
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
TFC PARTNERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Murphy v. Genesis Detox of Brooklyn LLC MSW IP et al
as 1:2022cv06568
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Defendant:
Genesis Detox of Brooklyn LLC MSW IP and Monte Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jimenez v. City of Cohoes Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant:
City of Cohoes Police Department, Officer J. Murphy, Officer: John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booker v. Flint et al
as 9:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Defendant:
Flint, Murphy and Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Hobo Construction Company et al
as 1:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Devon Murphy
Defendant:
Hobo Construction Company, Bullfighter Construction, Inc. and Jesus Rico
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Colombe v. Murphy et al
as 9:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe, III and Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Murphy, John A. Winchell, LT Breyear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv07035
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Dillon
Defendant:
Harvey Rosen, James McQueeney, Esq., Bonnie Wittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
