Cases 121 - 130 of 11,729
United States of America v. 14.368 Acres, more or less, Situated in Kern County, State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
14.368 Acres, more or less, Situated in Kern County, State of California, Precious Earth, Inc., Vignolo Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Burke v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Greg Burke
Defendant:
City of San Diego, State of California and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Turner v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
David B. Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
State of California, M.T.S., County of San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Betts v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
Brittany Betts
Defendant:
County of Alameda, City of San Leandro and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonshorowski v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1985
Petitioner:
ANALEAH MORIAH GONSHOROWSKI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Mengistu v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2041
Plaintiff:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity and OTHERS TO BE JOINED UNDER RULE 19 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
People of the State of California v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al.
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC, ESI MAIL PHARMACY SERVICE, INC. and others
Serrano v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Serrano
Defendant:
City of Stockton, County of Stockton and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
