Cases 121 - 130 of 947
Cutner v. Johnson et al
as 9:2020cv04119
Defendant:
Sheik Johnson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Lamont W Cutner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. Stirling et al
as 3:2020cv04084
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Alan Wilson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernard Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gause v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv03841
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Gause
Defendant:
Lt Dorm Supervisor, Officer Meridith, Kirkland Corr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Mack et al
as 1:2020cv03691
Defendant:
Travis Guess, Albert L. Mack and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Eric Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonza v. McMasters et al
as 6:2020cv03629
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling, Warden Nelson, Henry McMasters and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alonza and Alonza Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheftall v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2020cv03441
Plaintiff:
Reginald C Sheftall, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 8:2020cv03356
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rivera
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boulb v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv03300
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Boulb
Defendant:
Mr. Phelps, Department of Corrections and Attorney Steve Welby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. South Carolina Department of Corr.
as 8:2020cv03168
Petitioner:
Michael T Braxton
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
