Cases 121 - 130 of 836,757
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Havies
as 4:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nathaniel Havies, Jr. individually and d/b/a All In One Cigars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Corbett v. City Of Rockport et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
City Of Rockport, Aransas County and Mayor Jaroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conroe Independent School District v. Ruiz
as 4:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Conroe Independent School District
Defendant:
Marcelo Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lieberman et al v. ADI DAGAN et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Dr. Isador Lieberman, KENNETH CORRADO, DR. PAUL HOLMAN and others
Defendant:
ADI DAGAN and D.I. DAGAN CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wallace & Sons' Wrecker Service, LLC v. Shelby Logistics, LTD
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wallace & Sons' Wrecker Service, LLC
Defendant:
Shelby Logistics, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vasquez et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Cesar Vasquez and Mayra Vasquez
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Freddy Hurley
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
