Cases 121 - 130 of 15,518
Miller et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Angela Boykin
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
(PS) Jutla v. Redfin Corporation
as 2:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Rajninder Jutla
Defendant:
Redfin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Owens v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
WATSON v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04445
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE WATSON
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Boca Botana's Inc v. United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative et al
as 0:2024cv01106
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, United Sugars Corporation, American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Boca Botana's Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Kyndberg v. Apple, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
KENDRA KYNDBERG
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Dowdell v. Byrd et al.
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Nailah K. Byrd, Leslie Celebrezze, Ditko Devione and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
KURTZ v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04355
Plaintiff:
STACEY KURTZ
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. v. AMARIN PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04341
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant:
AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED and AMARIN CORPORATION PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Wang v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2024cv02371
Plaintiff:
Dr Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc., HOMESERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
