Cases 121 - 130 of 12,488
Rodriguez-Macedo v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Rodriguez-Macedo
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosenthal v. Lewis County et al
as 3:2024cv05162
Plaintiff:
Zachary R Rosenthal
Defendant:
Lewis County, Shannon Crowl and Lewis County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Victor M Rojas-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lindahl v. Thatcher
as 3:2024cv05160
Petitioner:
Peter Anton Lindahl
Respondent:
Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bosarge v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Milton Wayne Bosarge
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. DOC Superintendent
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Blayne Jeffrey Coley
Respondent:
DOC Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ptah v. Berger et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Malek Kalid Ptah
Defendant:
Franke Berger, Brad Bales and Mark B Tackitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willoughby v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Thomas Willoughby
Defendant:
Kyle Sherwood, Seatac Federal Detention Center and Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
