Cases 121 - 130 of 93,603
Li v. Chung LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jianxin Li
Defendant:
Chung LLC doing business as Chung's Barber Shop and Stanley Chung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Conry, et al v. Gerber Products Company, et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conry, Kelsey Daker, Hailey Ronayne and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Perrigo Company PLC, L. Perrigo Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Brown v. Knott et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Mr. Leroy Alexander Brown
Defendant:
Major William Knott, Deputy A. Waldren and Corporal D. Wistrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Adams v. Del Toro
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Adams
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
