Cases 121 - 130 of 16,151
Sabat-Esquilin v. Ocasio-Montanez
as 3:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jose A Sabat-Esquilin
Defendant:
Luis Ocasio-Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. N.C.S.O et al
as 1:2024cv10643
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
N.C.S.O, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Coppinger, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, V, STAFFORD GRAVELY, ALVAH PIKE and others
Defendant:
KEVIN COPPINGER, GEORGE GLYNOS, Individually and in their official capacities, KEVIN COPPINGER, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity and others
Sabat-Esquilin v. Ministerio Publico de PR
as 3:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Jose A Sabat-Esquilin
Defendant:
Ministerio Publico de PR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latham v. Jobson
as 1:2024cv10554
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Jose Jobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leo v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40021
Petitioner:
Anthony M Leo
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Pagan v. USA
as 3:2024cv01026
Petitioner:
Luis A. Garcia-Pagan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pawochawog-Mequinosh v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Wolf Pawochawog-Mequinosh and Brian Keith Brownell
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury, William . Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
