Cases 121 - 130 of 9,829
Hookom et al v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darin Hookom and Karen Hookom
Defendant:
Chandler Unified School District, Patrick Power, Unknown Power and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Johnson and Latonia Johnson
Defendant:
Chandler Unified School District, Yolanda Carreto Diaz, Dionicio Corte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
