Cases 121 - 130 of 2,228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hobbs v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kymberly Hobbs
Defendant:
Anthony Raymond Kelly, Gregory Scott Plummer, Joshua Caleb Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Doe v. Radford University et al
as 7:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
Radford University and Dr. Andrea Zuschin, Title IX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Ayers et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Zachary R. Coleman
Defendant:
Jennifer Ayers and Lynn Muterspaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc., Wesley Thomas Gillespie and Christopher Paul Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City Of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Regina Davis
Defendant:
City Of Lynchburg, Ryan Zuidema, Police Officer #1 S.H. Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scearce v. Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Scearce
Defendant:
Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors and William Vic Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
