Cases 121 - 130 of 426,569
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Amatul-Halim v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 2:2024cv02039
Plaintiff:
Haniyya Amatul-Halim
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
HARDAWAY v. GREEN EGGS CAFE
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
GREEN EGGS CAFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWN v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
MS. BOBBI JO SALAMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNYSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and DR. EUGUNE DONALD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
