Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 131 - 140 of 23,147
Aceituno v. US
as 24-1343
Petitioner: WALTER ACEITUNO
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Loughlin v. Vi-Jon, LLC
as 24-8014
Petitioner: KRISTINA LOUGHLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: VI-JON, LLC
De La Cruz-Guerra v. Garland
as 24-1357
Petitioner: JAQUELINE GABRIELA DE LA CRUZ-GUERRA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ortiz-Montero v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff: NESTOR A. ORTIZ-MONTERO
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Chamberlin v. Alves
as 24-1340
Petitioner: PETER MARK CHAMBERLIN
Respondent: NELSON ALVES, Superintendent
Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal Insurance Company
as 24-1335
Plaintiff: COCO RICO, LLC
Defendant: UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Type: Contract Insurance
Guzman-Perez, et al v. Ojeda-Batista
as 24-1329
Plaintiff: JENNIE GUZMAN-PEREZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant: MANUEL OJEDA-BATISTA, PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT CORP. and MOB INVESTMENT CORP.
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 24-1342
Plaintiff: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant: ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond and CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
In Re: Searson
as 24-8012
Respondent: WILLIAM SEARSON
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Martinez-Diaz v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 24-1339
Plaintiff: PAOLA ORLANDA MARTINEZ-DIAZ
Defendant: FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION and GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?