Cases 131 - 140 of 1,604,008
LoPipero et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Patrick LoPipero and Lisa LoPipero
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Luning v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Michele A. Luning
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dodson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Kale Dodson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calhoun v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Andrew Calhoun
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02631
Plaintiff:
Clifford Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
Edwin Diaz
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Francisco et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02633
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Francisco and Lauren Francisco
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Donez v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02635
Plaintiff:
Celia Donez
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barron v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Albert Barron
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
Amber Lynn Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
