Cases 131 - 140 of 216
Baker v. Zicron, et al.,
as 3:2015cv30212
Defendant:
Lilo Ben Zicron and Robert Bohanon
Plaintiff:
Kim Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Muldoon v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv13892
Plaintiff:
Emmett S. Muldoon
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Carol Higgins OBrien, Sean Medeiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv30187
Plaintiff:
Brenda S. Murphy
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker, Marylou Sudders and Linda S. Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Racine v. Umass Correctional Health et al
as 1:2015cv13463
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racine
Defendant:
Umass Correctional Health, Massachusetts Partnership Correctional Health, Charles Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13304
Plaintiff:
Marianne Baker
Defendant:
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. and OS Restaurant Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santos v. Baker et al
as 1:2015cv12687
Plaintiff:
Angel Santos
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Steven Loughlin, Esquire, Gina Kwan, Esquire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12139
Plaintiff:
Jeretha Baker
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Miami Dade County Public School District et al
as 1:2015cv11813
Defendant:
Pamela Johnson, Alberto Flores, George T. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Social Security
as 1:2015cv11467
Plaintiff:
Darlene Baker
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Haddad Jr. v. Baker., Jr
as 1:2015cv11323
Plaintiff:
Philip G. Haddad Jr.
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker., Jr, Timothy P. Alben, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
