Cases 131 - 140 of 147
Tucker v. Allen et al
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Jason Tucker
Defendant:
Ross Allen, FNU Pyly, Brian Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POCKET CITY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. SEPULVEDA et al
as 3:2012cv00119
Defendant:
DR. ROOF, INC., JOSH MCINTYRE and RICK SEPULVEDA
Plaintiff:
POCKET CITY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
TONEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00376
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOSH TONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TONEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00378
Respondent:
KETH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOSH TONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00089
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JOSH R. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LIPE et al v. MONESSEN HEARTH SYSTEMS COMPANY
as 1:2011cv01684
Plaintiff:
HEATHER LIPE and JOSH LIPE
Defendant:
MONESSEN HEARTH SYSTEMS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colvin et al v. Calumet Masonry Co et al
as 2:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Fred A Colvin and William Solivais
Defendant:
Calumet Masonry Co, Ronald J Zurek and Josh Holder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ford v. Eastes et al
as 1:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
D'Breante Ford
Defendant:
Richard Eastes, Warren Dailey, Josh Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Eastes et al
as 1:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
David J Wise
Defendant:
Richard Eastes, Josh Zigler, Joe Fortner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
