Cases 131 - 140 of 661
Cornelio v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2019cv01240
Defendant:
Jane Doe, State of Connecticut, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James P. Cornelio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Sharr et al
as 3:2019cv01233
Defendant:
Correction Inc., Carleton J. Giles, DeNote and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VRM v. Zackowski
as 3:2019cv01200
Defendant:
Peter P. Zackowski, IV and Peter P. Zackowski, III
Plaintiff:
VRM
Subrian v. Neff et al
as 3:2019cv01119
Defendant:
Peter Reichard, Darrin Omara, City of New London and others
Plaintiff:
Ciara Subrian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Oasis International Group Limited et al
as 3:2019mc00089
Nominal Defendant:
444 Gulf of Mexico Drive, LLC, 4Oaks LLC, 13318 Lost Key Place, LLC and others
Defendant:
John J. Haas, Satellite Holdings Company, Michael J. Dacorta and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Not Yet Classified:
Burton W. Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Fenton v. Woodland Village Townhouses, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01020
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Steve Brown, Woodland Village Townhouses, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaffney v. Butricks
as 3:2019cv00934
Petitioner:
Francis P. Gaffney
Respondent:
Kenneth Butricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyson v. Doyle, et al
as 3:2019cv00916
Defendant:
Patrick J. Clifford, Christopher Duby, John P. Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Tesei et al
as 3:2019cv00722
Defendant:
BRIAN TORNGA, Andrew Greco, TOWN OF GREENWICH CONNECTICUT and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
