Cases 131 - 140 of 4,130
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024mc00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 2:2024mc00562
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 2:2024mc00563
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
