Cases 131 - 140 of 37,359
IMGRAM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ingram
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Donnie Thomas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carrera v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv21432
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Carrera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
Bradley v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Lucas Lorenzo Bradley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Soderman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Richard Soderman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Claiborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
David Claiborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Figueroa-Padilla v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Figueroa-Padilla
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claiborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
David Claiborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jary Watson v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 24-10668
Plaintiff:
JARY WATSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
