Cases 131 - 140 of 100,914
David Gevas v. John Varga, et al
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. GEVAS
Defendant:
JOHN VARGA, SONJA NICKLAUS, JUSTIN WILKS and others
Thomas v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Julian Thomas
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Chris Watkins, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Clark
as 1:2024cv01161
Petitioner:
Jimmy Tilley, Jr
Respondent:
Tiffany Clark
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
DETRIC O. DOE
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. DULAP et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant:
DULAP, JAIL COMMANDER, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Blake D Wilson
Defendant:
Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks, Leon v. Wisconsin Resource Center et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Leon Jovani Banks
Defendant:
Wisconsin Resource Center, Medical Staff John Doe 1 thru 12 and Jane Doe Medical Staff 1 thru 12 Employees et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
