Cases 131 - 140 of 20,689
LOMBARDO v. ZANELLI et al
as 5:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
AMY ZANELLI, OFFICER ANDREW YOST, ROBERT L. NICKELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. WESCOE et al
as 5:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
COLIN WESCOE, DET. SGT. HAMMER, DET. P. MACZKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTLETT v. PRISONS?
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
NIHJAE BARTLETT
Defendant:
PRISONS?
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: GARNET SMITH
as 2:2024cv01422
Not Yet Classified:
GARNET SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDY HAAG v. TERRA
as 5:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
RANDY HAAG
Respondent:
JOSEPH TERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
BELL v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Petitioner:
MONTANA BELL
Respondent:
JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopherson v. Gourley et al
as 5:2024cv01343
Petitioner:
Charles Christopherson
Respondent:
MR. MICHAEL GOURLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON-EL v. BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY, KELLY REED, SPRNTNDNT. MATILLUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEACH-HILTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
NIKEEM LEACH-HILTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
