Cases 131 - 140 of 102,446
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. US Postal Employees et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson and Ronald Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Employees and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
