Cases 141 - 150 of 191
Conley v. Smith et al
as 0:2013cv01069
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Conley
Respondent:
Michelle Smith and Attorney General of the state of Minnesota, The
Stoltz v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Stoltz
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of and Attorney General
Wetsch v. United States Attorney's Office - District of MN et al
as 0:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Mark Edward Wetsch
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office - District of MN, Deidre Aanstad, Federal Defender's Office - District of Minnesota and others
Hunter et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Inez Hunter and Dannez Hunter
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, City of Woodbury, Washington County and others
Kern v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2012cv02816
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Kern
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Wadena County Social Services, Wadena County Attorney's Office and others
Flores v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 0:2012cv02774
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Attorney General and Public Health Service Named Sierra Medical Center
Barnes v. Hammer et al
as 0:2012cv02745
Petitioner:
Danny Kwami Barnes
Respondent:
Steve Hammer and Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Correia v. US Dept. of Justice et al
as 0:2012cv01339
Plaintiff:
Gregory Correia
Defendant:
US Dept. of Justice, United States Marshals and Office of the United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01207
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wickner v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
