Cases 141 - 150 of 189
White v. Rich et al
as 1:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
Willie Paul White
Respondent:
Steven N Rich, State of Texas, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wadsworth v. Valdez et al
as 3:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lynn Wadsworth
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, Unknown Doctor, Zia Rehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Valdez
as 3:2009cv02435
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Fletcher
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton v. Garland Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv02048
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Clayton
Defendant:
Garland Police Department, B. N. Worsham, NFN Hatfield and others
Amicu:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Valdez et al
as 3:2009cv01446
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, John Vance, Hugh Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Valdez et al
as 4:2009cv02320
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, John Vance, Hugh Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
Brenson Dudley Smith
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Lupe Valdez, NFN Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Pearson
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jane J. Boyle, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Duke v. Lew Sterrett Justice Center et al
as 3:2009cv00317
Petitioner:
James Willie Duke, III
Respondent:
Lew Sterrett Justice Center and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maldonado v. Valdez
as 3:2009cv00252
Petitioner:
Enrique Maldonado
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
