Cases 141 - 150 of 215
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant:
CHRIS A. WILLIAMS, PEREZ, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DEA GOAD, KATHY ALVEY and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN R. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2020cv01927
Defendant:
DEPOSKI, BIRD, BENNET and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK L. BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00607
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lee Gipson
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, Robert E Carter, Jr, Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJABU v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00369
Respondent:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., KRISTINA M. BOX, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Petitioner:
KOFI AJABU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Anastaisa Renee and Elmer D Charles, Jr
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Ron Neal and Eric Holcomb
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2020cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WAYNE MURPHY and HAMZEH WALI ABU JIHAD
Defendant:
M. LINCOLN, B. SMITH, DAVID LIEBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CARTER
as 2:2020cv00349
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WAYNE MURPHY and HAMZEH WALI ABU JIHAD
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY and DONYALL E. WHITE, ESTATE
Defendant:
STAFF MEMBERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES LLC, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB
as 2:2020cv00332
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY and DONYALL E. WHITE, ESTATE
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, W. DUNKLEY, WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
