Cases 141 - 150 of 163,489
Reganos v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Ryan Reganos
Defendant:
Frances Watson, Robert Worle and Matthew Cristy
M.P. v. Shiv Global Hotel, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
M.P.
Defendant:
Shiv Global Hotel, LLC doing business as Knights Inn and Global Management & Investment Corporation doing business as Knights Inn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Forced Labor, Sex Trafficking
Hornung et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Hornung and Zia, Incorporated
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ramey v. White County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Danny Dewayne Ramey
Defendant:
White County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Emory University
as 1:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Emory University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Nadera Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Tuck
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Tuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
