Cases 141 - 150 of 85,010
DUBOSE et al v. U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHASTEEN v. BARTLETT
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
DAKOTA SHASTEEN
Respondent:
WARDEN BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURTON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
LAFENUS BURTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VIERA v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
WIGBERTO VIERA
Respondent:
S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Nobblen
Defendant:
Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheeler v. Cherry et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Dustin Sheeler
Defendant:
Cherry, Warholic, S. McCorkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. QUINLAN et al
as 1:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. ROMAN
Defendant:
J. QUINLAN, HICKOCK, S. PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLEJOHN v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
DONTA D. LITTLEJOHN
Respondent:
WARDEN S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
