Cases 141 - 150 of 25,560
Gallow v. Myers
as 6:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Justin Gallow
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jefferson v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Mikese Jefferson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. 21st Judicial District Court
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Strickland
Defendant:
21st Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holland v. USA
as 5:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Ronald Carnell Holland, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Huesman v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Not Yet Classified:
Deputy MICHELLE RUFFIN
Plaintiff:
Ms. JULIE STEWART HUESMAN and Julie Stewart Huesman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Michelle Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phelps et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Security Management, Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Leslie Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Holloway
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Earl Hollins
Defendant:
Lt. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Russell Roberts and Andria Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
