Cases 141 - 150 of 10,602
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allman v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allman, II
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tibbs, Correctional Officer Sams and Corr. Officer II Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernazal v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Miguel Bernazal
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pryor v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pryor
Defendant:
City of Charleston, Detective W. McCabe, Cory Jarett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Fleming
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. Correctional Officer Fleming
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
William Posey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
