Cases 141 - 150 of 7,526
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Anthony Darnell Stokes
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Gary Swaney and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lesiak v. LeMasters
as 0:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Jacob Alexander Lesiak
Respondent:
David LeMasters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Osoria-Abru v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Alexis Osoria-Abru
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold Ball
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Green
as 0:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Eugene Lamont Baker
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernick v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
Michael Bernick
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
