Cases 141 - 150 of 30,363
Caldwell v. Carroll et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll, FNU Adkins and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guin v. North Carolina Adult Corrections
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRADO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00288
Petitioner:
ALEXIS JEOVANNI ESCANDON PRADO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCLAM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
WARDELL JERMAINE MCCLAM, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Cruz Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Leon Jackson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilder et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03038
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Estate of Carolyn Bryant and Federal Judge Elizabeth Mulligan
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Federal Judge Richard E. Myers, II, New Hanover County NC Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Barker
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antonio Yulander Pearson and Tony
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024ct03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GRIFFITH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
