Cases 141 - 150 of 114,111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alvarez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00765
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Alberto Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Lerch et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shauntay Wade
Defendant:
Kyle Lerch, John Doe #1 and Kennedy Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00385
Defendant:
David Butler, Rich Beck and Troy Hershberger
Plaintiff:
Deondre Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ailes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jessica J. Ailes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WARD et al v. AMERICAN ROOFING AND METAL
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN WARD and BENJAMIN C. WARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN ROOFING AND METAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WARD et al v. AMERICAN ROOFING AND METAL COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN WARD and BENJAMIN C. WARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN ROOFING AND METAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MUDD et al v. WISEMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VAN WINKLE, GARY CUNNINGHAM and JOHN DAVID MUDD
Defendant:
DAVID WEINBRENNER, CRAWFORD COUNTY, INDIANA, NATHAN WISEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
