Cases 151 - 160 of 226
Schillo v. Dillard et al
as 5:2012cv02656
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Schillo
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, DeWayne Estes, Carolyn Flack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esensoy v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 5:2012cv02625
Petitioner:
George Esensoy
Respondent:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swain v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Bennie Carl Swain
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Board of Pardons and Paroles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Addie v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
Danny Lamar Addie
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, William W. Wynne, Jr., Robert P. Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Kennedy v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv00311
Petitioner:
Richard D Kennedy
Respondent:
Willy Thomas, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Bill Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Marsh, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Louis Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Senator Marsh, Mike Hubbard, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Glen I. Taylor
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Dillard and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
