Cases 151 - 160 of 80,631
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Daniel Norton
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Jorge J Navarette
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christilaw v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Clara Christilaw
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Whitney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Charlie James Whitney
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Jonah Myckel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buckingham et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Buckingham and Kyong Buckingham
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
